Experiments / GPT-5.4-Thinking Deep / Example 5.docx

Back to data browser
This page is a uniformly styled HTML rendering of the original Word file. The original Word file is retained in the data folder for verification.
[WARNING] Could not convert TeX math send(m)\text{\:\,} \parallel \text{\:\,}recv(o) , rendering as TeX: send(m)\text{\:\,} \parallel \text{\:\,} ^ unexpected "\\" expecting "}", text, "{", "$", "$$", "\\(" or "\\[" [WARNING] Could not convert TeX math a\text{\:\,} \prec \text{\:\,}recv(o) , rendering as TeX: a\text{\:\,} \prec \text{\:\,}recv(o) ^ unexpected "\\" expecting "}", text, "{", "$", "$$", "\\(" or "\\["

Question: Consider the following two message sequence charts labelled "first" and "second"; compose them horizontally and draw the resulting composed message sequence chart.

Answer:

et us first restate what is in each MSC, based on the picture.

msc first

Instances: i, j, k

msc second

Instances: i, j, k

Horizontal composition

Horizontal composition places the two MSCs side by side and combines them into a single MSC with the same instances.

Key semantic points:

Resulting composed MSC (ASCII sketch)

msc first || second

i j k

+-----+ +-----+ +-----+

| | |

|---- m --------->| |

| | |

| | | [a]

| | |

|---- n --------->|<-------- o -----|

| | |

===== ===== =====

Ordering summary

Preserved orderings:

No ordering between:

If you like, I can also give the formal partial order or discuss linearizations (traces) of the composed MSC.

Please draw the resulting of MSC.

The resulting horizontally composed MSC should have the same three instances i, j, and k, with the behaviour of both MSCs superimposed while preserving their internal orders.

A clean textual sketch is:

Plain Text

msc first || second

i j k

+-----+ +-----+ +-----+

| | |

|---- m --------->| |

|---- n --------->| |

| | |

| |<-------- o -----|

| | | [a]

| | |

===== ===== =====

Show more lines

So the composed chart contains:

with the local ordering from second preserved on j, namely:

recv(n) ≺ recv(o)

and the local action a from first remaining on instance k.

Question: What is the order between sending m and receiving o in the composed diagram.

Answer:

In the horizontally composed MSC, there is no ordering constraint between

Formally, their relation is:

$$send(m)\text{\:\,} \parallel \text{\:\,}recv(o) $$

Explanation

Conclusion:
Sending m and receiving o are concurrent (unordered) in the composed diagram.

Question:

Please consider the original two MSCs labelled "first" and "second", given here again. Please compose them vertically (by putting "first" on top and "second" at the bottom). Please draw the resulting composed diagram

Answer:

Here is the intended vertical composition of first ; second, with first above second:

Plain Text

msc first ; second

i j k

+-----+ +-----+ +-----+

| | |

|------ m --------------->| |

| | |

| | [ a ]

| | |

| | |

|------ n --------------->| |

| |<-------------- o -------|

| | |

===== ===== =====

Show more lines

So the composed MSC contains:

with all events of first ordered before all events of second.

Question:

What is the order between internal event a and receiving o in the vertically composed MSC.

Answer:

In the vertically composed MSC first ; second, the internal event a is in msc first, while receiving o is in msc second.

Since vertical composition puts all events of first before all events of second, the ordering is:

$$a\text{\:\,} \prec \text{\:\,}recv(o) $$

So:

The internal event a strictly precedes the receiving of o.

Even though a occurs on instance k and recv(o) occurs on instance j, vertical composition introduces a global sequential ordering from the first MSC to the second MSC.